Though the tone of the story is more comparable to children
stories, The Hobbit is still an epic
and shares many characteristics of traditional epics.
One characteristic is a sense of tradition, as is seen
through multiple characters and objects. The most obvious example is that
hobbits do not like adventure, a tradition that Bilbo breaks on account of the reverse
tradition carried on by his mother’s family. Another example could be found in
regards to the swords that the party takes from the trolls’ lair, as Elrond
points out that they were made by the elves and goes on to explain their history.
Another characteristic that The Hobbit shares with traditional epics, such as Beowulf, is that the characters face challenge after
challenge against objectively evil antagonists. We are only 4 chapters into the
story and already the party has nearly been killed twice, only to be saved by
Gandalf at the last minute. This also brings up the idea that, even though
Bilbo slowly grows to fit his position as a hero, Gandalf could be
compared to Beowulf or Odysseus, as time and time again he proves himself to be
the only one capable of defeating the antagonists.
Why do you think Tolkien chose to make The Hobbit come off as more of a children story instead of making
it more mature?
I think that "The Hobbit" is more of a children's story because the characters are so bizarre. You have these ridiculous looking characters and the tone of the book doesn't really seem to be serious. The storyline is also the adventures of fairytale creatures which would definitely appeal to a younger reader.
ReplyDelete