In the poem "The Flea" by John Donne he uses a flea to
resemble an unborn baby. In the first stanza Donne proclaims, "how little
that which thou deniest me is; it me sucked first and now suck thee, and in
this flea our two blood mingled be" (2-4) Donne first introduces the flea
as a creature made by the act of love formed between a man and wife but as the
flea needs more and more it the flea becomes less like a baby and more as a
flea, a blood-sucker, that strives off others blood and bodily functions. He
compares a flea as an unborn baby stating “how little that which though deniest
me" (2) addressing the size of the creature as tiny that overall has a
large impact in his life (specifically love). The tone turns into frustration
as it becomes clear since the flea (the baby) appeared the attention has been
split between the husband and the child, and the husband has been left unsatisfied
as a result. The stanza continues proclaiming, “a sin or shame or loss of
maidenhead” (6) referring to the act of lovemaking took away his manhood as now
the wife has no time for his needs. While at the beginning of the poem the baby
was a creature that reflected the love of a marriage by the end of the poem
Donne states, “As this flea’s death took life from thee.” (27) In conclusion, while
the baby grows the father shrinks in terms of how is viewed as most important
in the women’s eyes. My overall question is if we as people think this poem is
relatable to anyone in this situation dealing with pregnancy or with children.
And if so then are most men likely to feel such hatred for their child stealing
their attention or love that they are here expanding their family?
Although I know the poem is difficult to interpret, I think we have opposing views on the flea. First of all, I think the woman refuses to have sex with him, as opposed to his wife who is tired of him. Also, even though I had not thought of it this way, I do not think the flea represents a baby, but more so an abstract symbol that is far beyond the establishment of marriage (even though this is changed to meaninglessness in the third stanza). I think your interpretation of wives and pregnancy is a unique interpretation of the poem, but I do not agree with it.
ReplyDelete